Skip to content

The consent report

Who has to agree before you press record

Fifty states and the District of Columbia. 11 require everyone in the conversation to consent, 36 require only that you are in it, and 4 depend on how the conversation is happening.

As of .

How the rule works

Recording law in the United States is not one rule. Federal law and thirty-six states let a person who is part of a conversation record it. Eleven states require that everyone in the conversation consent. Four more do not fit either bucket, because the answer changes with the medium or with whether you are facing a prosecutor or a plaintiff.

The rule that binds you is usually the strictest one that touches the conversation. A call between someone in Texas and someone in California is the reason this report exists: two people, two rules, one recording.

Scribe's answer to all of this is not to pick a rule for you. It is to make the recording obvious while it happens — the screen says so, and the app announces it — so that consent is something the room gives rather than something a policy page claims.

What this report does not cover

  • It covers conversations you are part of. It says nothing about recording a conversation you are not in, which is a different and much shorter answer: don't.
  • It covers audio. Video, screen capture and workplace monitoring have their own rules.
  • It states the rule, not your exposure. Whether a particular recording is admissible, or whether making it exposes you to a civil claim, is a question about your facts.

Everyone must consent (11)

In these jurisdictions, being part of the conversation is not enough. If you are unsure which rule applies to a conversation, this is the set to assume you are in.

All-party consent jurisdictions
JurisdictionStatute
CaliforniaCal. Penal Code § 632
DelawareDel. Code tit. 11 § 1335
FloridaFla. Stat. § 934.03
Illinois720 ILCS 5/14-2
MarylandMd. Code, Cts. & Jud. Proc. § 10-402
MassachusettsMass. Gen. Laws ch. 272 § 99
MontanaMont. Code § 45-8-213
NevadaNev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.620, 200.650
New HampshireN.H. Rev. Stat. § 570-A:2
Pennsylvania18 Pa. C.S. § 5703
WashingtonWash. Rev. Code § 9.73.030

It depends (4)

The popular two-colour maps of this question put every state in one bucket or the other. These four do not fit, because the answer changes with the medium or with whether the exposure is criminal or civil.

Jurisdictions where the rule depends on the facts
JurisdictionStatute
ConnecticutConn. Gen. Stat. §§ 53a-189, 52-570d
MichiganMich. Comp. Laws § 750.539c
OregonOr. Rev. Stat. § 165.540
VermontNo recording statute; State v. Geraw and its line of cases

One party is enough (36)

A person who is part of the conversation may record it. Federal law says the same thing, which is why this is the larger set.

One-party consent jurisdictions
JurisdictionStatute
AlabamaAla. Code §§ 13A-11-30, 13A-11-31
AlaskaAlaska Stat. § 42.20.310
ArizonaAriz. Rev. Stat. § 13-3005
ArkansasArk. Code § 5-60-120
ColoradoColo. Rev. Stat. § 18-9-303
District of ColumbiaD.C. Code § 23-542
GeorgiaGa. Code § 16-11-62
HawaiiHaw. Rev. Stat. § 803-42
IdahoIdaho Code § 18-6702
IndianaInd. Code § 35-33.5-5-5
IowaIowa Code § 808B.2
KansasKan. Stat. § 21-6101
KentuckyKy. Rev. Stat. § 526.010
LouisianaLa. Rev. Stat. § 15:1303
MaineMe. Rev. Stat. tit. 15 § 710
MinnesotaMinn. Stat. § 626A.02
MississippiMiss. Code § 41-29-531
MissouriMo. Rev. Stat. § 542.402
NebraskaNeb. Rev. Stat. § 86-290
New JerseyN.J. Stat. § 2A:156A-4
New MexicoN.M. Stat. § 30-12-1
New YorkN.Y. Penal Law §§ 250.00, 250.05
North CarolinaN.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-287
North DakotaN.D. Cent. Code § 12.1-15-02
OhioOhio Rev. Code § 2933.52
OklahomaOkla. Stat. tit. 13 § 176.4
Rhode IslandR.I. Gen. Laws § 11-35-21
South CarolinaS.C. Code § 17-30-30
South DakotaS.D. Codified Laws § 23A-35A-20
TennesseeTenn. Code § 39-13-601
TexasTex. Penal Code § 16.02
UtahUtah Code § 77-23a-4
VirginiaVa. Code § 19.2-62
West VirginiaW. Va. Code § 62-1D-3
WisconsinWis. Stat. § 968.31
WyomingWyo. Stat. § 7-3-702

Draft — not yet reviewed by counsel. The 51 jurisdiction pages are drafts. Two — California and New York, the clearest example of each rule — are published; the rest are excluded from search engines until counsel has been through them.